Plus Delta Template

One of the simplest and fastest retrospective formats there is. The plus column collects everything going well that should be repeated, while the delta column gathers what the team wants to change or improve. Its minimal structure makes it perfect for quick check-ins and teams that want to retrospect often without overhead.
Plus

Everything that's going well and should be repeated for the future

Roman

Roman

Review turnaround dropped to under a day
Maria

Maria

The Wednesday demo kept scope honest
Delta

Everything that you want to change or that can be improved

Anna

Anna

Cap work in progress at two items per person
Daria

Daria

Tickets arrive with acceptance criteria or they are not estimated

What is the Plus/Delta retrospective?

The Plus/Delta retrospective is one of the simplest and fastest reflection formats available. It asks just two questions: what worked well (Plus) and what should change (Delta). The word "delta" deliberately replaces "minus" to keep the focus on change rather than blame — a delta is a desired adjustment, not a failure. Because it is so lightweight, Plus/Delta is ideal for closing out meetings, workshops, sprints, or events when you want quick, honest feedback without a heavy facilitation effort. The format uses two columns:

  • Plus — what went well and is worth keeping.
  • Delta — what should change next time.

Plus

In the Plus column, the team records everything that went well: effective practices, smooth collaboration, good decisions, or pleasant surprises. These entries tell you what to protect and repeat. Keeping the positives visible also balances the conversation so the retro does not become a list of complaints.

Delta

The Delta column captures changes the team wants to make. Frame each item as a concrete adjustment — "start estimating tickets together" rather than "estimates were bad." Because deltas are written as future improvements, they translate almost directly into action items, which is why this format is so efficient for continuous improvement.

Benefits of the Plus/Delta retrospective

  • Extremely fast — runs in 10–15 minutes.
  • Easy to learn, so anyone can facilitate it.
  • Frames feedback as change, not criticism.
  • Produces action items almost automatically.
  • Perfect for closing meetings, workshops, and events.
  • Keeps the team in a steady rhythm of improvement.

How to run a Plus/Delta retrospective

  1. Create a board in QRetro from the Plus/Delta template and share it with participants.
  2. Briefly state what the retro is reflecting on — the meeting, sprint, or event.
  3. Give everyone 3–5 minutes to add cards to the Plus and Delta columns.
  4. Read the Plus column aloud to acknowledge what worked.
  5. Discuss the deltas, group similar ones, and pick the top changes to make.
  6. Assign owners to each delta and save the board to track progress.

Similar templates

Other formats teams pair with this one — open any of them as a board in one click.
Energy Levels
A check-in format that focuses on the team's energy rather than its tasks. Participants place themselves between fully charged, medium power and low battery, then reflect on what drained or fueled the sprint's energy. Tracking it over time helps spot burnout early and keep the team's pace sustainable.
Weather Forecast Retrospective
A vivid metaphor that describes the sprint as a weather forecast. Stormy stands for the turbulent issues, rainy for the troublesome challenges, cloudy for the things that turned out rosy and sunny for what felt bright and successful. The imagery makes it easy to express how the sprint felt and to spot patterns across several retrospectives.
ESVP (Explorers, Shoppers, Vacationers, Prisoners)
An opening activity that gauges how people feel about being in the retrospective itself. Anonymously, everyone places themselves as an explorer eager for new ideas, a shopper open to one useful takeaway, a vacationer glad for a break or a prisoner who'd rather be elsewhere. The result helps the facilitator read the room and adjust the session to the team's real mood.
SOAR Analysis
A strengths-based alternative to SWOT that keeps the conversation positive and ambitious. The team examines its strengths and opportunities, articulates its aspirations and defines the results that will show those goals were met. By focusing on potential rather than problems, SOAR is well suited to strategy sessions and teams setting a bold direction.
Pre Mortem
A forward-looking format that imagines failure before it happens. The team pretends the project has already failed and asks why — what went wrong, what wasn't done, which problems remain and what other concerns linger. Surfacing risks at the start makes them far easier to prevent than to fix after the fact.
Went Well - To Improve - Action Items
A classic retrospective for reviewing the results of a sprint or stage of work. The team captures what worked well, where it lost momentum and which concrete steps will move things forward. The simple three-column structure keeps the focus balanced between celebrating successes and turning problems into action items that the team can actually take ownership of.
Try Template